Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2004 Summer Olympics

São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2004 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 15, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Olympics Mid‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Sao Tome & Principe Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	São Tomé and Príncipe portal This article is supported by WikiProject São Tomé and Príncipe (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2004 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll have this completed by tomorrow JAGUAR 15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

The lead should be expanded to reach a minimum of two paragraphs so it can comply per WP:LEAD and also help with the organisation of this article

Done. I did make some changes to the last paragraph. Let me know that the edits were OK.

"Usually, an NOC would be able to enter three qualified athletes" - a NOC, or even "the" would work

Already done. I corrected this before you started the review.

Again it shoudl be explained what the "A" and "B" standards for athletes? This should be explained somewhere in the article for people unfamiliar

Done

This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as the GA critera 3(a) is looking for. I would recommend any small expansion if possible but if this is not possible I'm willing to let this go as I believe the reliable sources implemented in this article are make it broad as it is
Expanded it a bit. Sadly I couldn't find as much infomation as I did with Vanuatu at the 2004 Summer Olympics.

References

No dead links

On hold

Sorry this took so long. Much like the last article this is a compact article despite the short review, so I'll leave this on hold until everything can be clarified. Again I suggested an expansion of the lead and anywhere else in the article (if possible) as it may not meet the broadness part of the criteria. But let me know if you have any questions, good luck JAGUAR 12:40, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: Thanks for the review. I could not find as much infomation as I did with Vanuatu at the 2004 Summer Olympics sadly. Still, I managed to expand it a bit, so I hope this now meets the GA criteria. Good888 (talk) 13:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! You've done a good job with this article and with that it now meets the GA criteria, well done

JAGUAR 19:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]