Talk:São Tomé and Príncipe at the 1996 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 15:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Hi Courcelles! I am going to review this article as well. I will complete a quick c/e of the article first. Feel free to revert any of the changes, as I will only make what I feel are non-controversial improvements. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

Here is my copyedit. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prose & MOS

Per MOS:DUPLINK, I would remove at least the last instance in the prose of the linking to Sortelina Pires and Odair Baia. Since the article is so short, I would probably just link in the lead and the table.
All other prose looks good. Pretty short and succinct. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images

No images used, except country flag, which is PD. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Are there any other references you can include? The article relies almost completely on one source (Sports Reference).
- I've added citations to the official report, though the reality is SR is a much easier version of the same data to navigate and read. Courcelles (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You archived all of the citations, even though all the pages are live? Is there a reason why?
- The SR website has a giant notice on the top of it that it'll be closing "soon". Courcelles (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All other references, formatting, and inline locations look good. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

Overall, the article is short and concise on a fiarly limited topic. Nice work, again! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Responded inline, Gonzo fan2007. Courcelles (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 00:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]