Talk:Ryder Report

Split

I think this article should be split into one seperate article for each report. The two reports are not related, and have nothing in common (except the author's name). Any objections? -De Facto 08:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No objections, what's your thinking for the article names: "Ryder Report (year)", "Ryder Report (nationality)" ? A more proper title of the first is "British Leyland: The Next Decade" but it is popularly known as the Ryder Report so that wouldn't be appropriate. GraemeLeggett 10:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For naming I was thinking "Ryder Report (topic)", it would be clear at a glance which you were interested in - "Ryder Report (British Leyland)" or "Ryder Report (Detention and Corrections in Iraq)". -De Facto 11:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good idea - you might as well do it now. I don't think a split could be justifiably challenged GraemeLeggett 12:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. We now have Ryder Report (Detention and Corrections in Iraq) and Ryder Report (British Leyland). -De Facto 13:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And all previous links to this page disambiguated too! GraemeLeggett 13:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]