Jump to content

Talk:Rydberg atom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

By my standards, this is a surprisingly accurate, complete article that is neither too elementary nor too advanced. The only significant fix would be to add more references with in-text citations. Teply (talk) 04:03, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further work

[edit]

I have added detailed references. I think there are improvements to be made, which I will work on in due course:

  • Details about precession of electron orbits due to core polarization effects (see ref 4, Hezel et al)
  • A replacement for the 1/r potential image showing a comparison of A/r with A/r + B/r4 —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJIndica (talkcontribs) 12:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • More on the quantum defect, which defines how "hydrogenic" a state is
  • Rydberg matter should either get its own subsection or be relegated to only "see also"

--DJIndica (talk) 23:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Very high quantum number'

[edit]

From the introduction: "... one or more electrons with a very high principal quantum number". How high is 'very high'? Later the figure n=137 is mentioned. Is this an indicative value? Could someone clarify - I would have thought n=10 was very high, but perhaps I'm off by an order of magnitude? Perhaps someone could add some quantification to the introduction, eg "typically n > 100". Thanks! 81.101.47.123 (talk) 12:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this definition does not seem very rigorous, but that is how it is almost universally stated. A better definition is the similarity to the potential in a hydrogen atom, as discussed in the article. From this perspective all states of H, He+, Li2+,... are Rydberg states. How high you have to go to be in a Rydberg state in a multi-electron atom depends on the system, and particularly the orbital angular momentum, and is not strictly defined.
The principle quantum number can go arbitrarily high, with the electron getting further from the ion core and adjacent states becoming more and more closely spaced. The n=∞ state corresponds to the ground state of the ion (the electron is infinitely far away). So you can judge the Rydberg nature of a state by its similarity to the ionic ground state.
You are correct that states in the n=10 manifold are generally considered Rydberg states, but they can go much higher than that.--DJIndica (talk) 18:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I adjusted the article wording slightly. It had explicitly stated that any atom with any electron in an n>1 level was considered a Rydberg atom but it also stated that the term only included excited states in which an electron was promoted into a formerly-unoccupied n level. Those are contradictory for any element with an electronic configuration that includes more than two electrons. I altered to be consistent that the ground state need not have all electrons in n=1 and therefore Rydberg is electrons excited into higher n than normal. It's still by analogy to H, and H/He+/Li2+ are still included in this adjusted wording, but now it's not restricted to them. Rb0 and others appear to have been studied. DMacks (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rydberg atom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is proposed that the black hole ringularity and the cosmic pre-inflationary state were Rydberg bodies.