Jump to content

Talk:Ryan ST

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Apology

[edit]

Sorry for adding Harrison Ford's recent crash landing in a Ryan ST. I didn't realize it didn't meet WP:AIRCRASH. Thanks, Ahunt. Clearly, I still have a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia.

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 15:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Ahunt (talk) 20:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Major Refactor

[edit]

Would anyone have an issue with me refactoring this page to move most of the information directly related to the PT-22 to that respective page? Although the PT-22 was developed from the ST it is a substantially different plane. Thanks! sjanicki —Preceding undated comment added 18:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ryan ST. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Air Force and Air Corps

[edit]

My father explained very clearly that he was in the Air Force but in the Medical Corps, not the Air Corps, the Force including other specialties and the Corps including only soldiers with aviation related duties. It is unlikely that he could have been wrong about what branches of service he belonged to, and I remember his words almost verbatim. He was in the Army during most of the war, and did not mention these names having changed in any way. He wore an Air Force Patch on his shoulder.— Preceding unsigned comment added by David R. Ingham (talkcontribs)

David, while you are technically correct, for all intents and purposes the USAAF replaced the USAAC as the top-level organization within the Army for aircraft operations, and thus can be considered its successor. - BilCat (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]