Talk:Russian submarine K-114 Tula/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jivesh boodhun ( talk · contribs) 09:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Note: Since most sources are in Russian, I am using Google translate for spotchecks. Please include the language parameter where needed. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Prose
[edit]- she carries - are submarines females? I thought we apply such subjects only in French language.
- Ships and boats are referred to as she. Search for "she" here and here read this. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- her during Tula's later operational life - Replace Tula's with her. The sentence is short and can be easily understood.
- Done. Done
- She also equipped with - Something missing?
- Done. Done
>Really impressive though a short article. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
References
[edit]- 4. Federation of American Scientists should not be in italics.
- 7. Bellona Foundation should not be in italics.
- 13. Add Digital Sky Technologies
- 15. Barents Observer should not be in italics.
- 18. Add Yulia Minder
- Why can't they be in italics? They're the creators of the works, aren't they? As for Barents Observer, I believe it's a newspaper. And what's "Yulia Minder" and "Digital Sky Technologies"? --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Because Wikipedia does not italicize them. Normally, magazines and newspapers are in italics, not online publications. For instance, online magazines are not in italics. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done with first and second. Barents Observer is a news source. What's "Yulia Minder" and "Digital Sky Technologies"? --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. The two other are the actual publishers. Jivesh1205 (Talk)
- Done with first and second. Barents Observer is a news source. What's "Yulia Minder" and "Digital Sky Technologies"? --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Because Wikipedia does not italicize them. Normally, magazines and newspapers are in italics, not online publications. For instance, online magazines are not in italics. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Jivesh1205 (Talk) 10:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Passing. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)