Talk:Russian submarine Belgorod

See also section

Ulysse de Saint-Sauveur The only required "see also" articles are those which are not already in the main body of the text. Several days ago I carefully added virtually all the articles in the 'see also' list to the main body, including key concepts like Russian Navy. Thus there is no reason to have them in any 'see also' section. Buckshot06 (talk) 17:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, it is not needed in see also if not in text. Vici Vidi (talk) 07:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Removal of overcites and WP:RS sources

I pruned some of the over cites and repeated references to Forbes contributor blogs, Wordpress blogs, Vice dot com articles, and excessive use of HI Sutton as a source for almost everything. For a Start class article, there seem to be an adequate number of sources, so I think I will remove the tag about that as well. If anyone feels that the tag should be put back, I will not object. FeralOink (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

k-329 was declared "Missing" by Titaneditor8839, on 11 February 2024‎

" 08:59, 11 February 2024‎ Titaneditor8839 talk contribs‎ 28,572 bytes −2‎ Changed ship status to "missing" because it recently went missing. undothank Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit "

I don't know any source for a such information, for my part. And Titaneditor8839 do not give his source. Is anybody can confirm this ? If not, I will return Ship status to "In service".

Thanks and Regards, Ulysse de Saint-Sauveur (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Change of the article's title by Llammakey, on 13 November 2024‎

I do not agree with modification of the title made by Llammakey, ( 13 November 2024, 14:25 : Llammakey moved page Russian submarine Belgorod (K-329) to Russian submarine Belgorod: per WP:NC-SHIPS, "only ship of name, no need for disambiguation" ) because statistics shows an immediate and very clear collapse in consultations of this article just after your unfortunate intervention.

Thanks and Regards, Ulysse de Saint-Sauveur (talk) 13:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@Ulysse de Saint-Sauveur: From Llammakey's edit summary, you can see that they cited Wikipedia's ship naming conventions as the rationale for that change. We try to follow our policies and guidelines wherever possible. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 19:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)