Jump to content

Talk:Russian monitor Rusalka/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 19:55, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    There's a mix of BrEng and AmEng, particularly in the units in the discovery section.
    The lead is a bit short - might want to include her class, that a monument was built for her crew, and perhaps a line about the exact cause of her sinking to be unknown (and perhaps that a new theory has been put forth following the discovery of the wreck)
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    In the monument section - Reval wasn't Tallinn until 1917
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    File:Rusalka1890Helsimgfors.jpg - needs a US PD tag
    Why not add a picture of the Rusalka memorial and merge the two Commons boxes?
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I think that I've fixed all of these, although I'm not sure what you mean about combining the Commons boxes.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Like so. Looks good now, passing for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't know you could do that!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]