Talk:Russian monitor Rusalka/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 19:55, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- There's a mix of BrEng and AmEng, particularly in the units in the discovery section.
- The lead is a bit short - might want to include her class, that a monument was built for her crew, and perhaps a line about the exact cause of her sinking to be unknown (and perhaps that a new theory has been put forth following the discovery of the wreck)
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- In the monument section - Reval wasn't Tallinn until 1917
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- File:Rusalka1890Helsimgfors.jpg - needs a US PD tag
- Why not add a picture of the Rusalka memorial and merge the two Commons boxes?
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I think that I've fixed all of these, although I'm not sure what you mean about combining the Commons boxes.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Like so. Looks good now, passing for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Didn't know you could do that!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)