Talk:Russian monitor Charodeika

Russian monitor Charodeika has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 16, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian monitor Charodeika/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 15:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
One dupe link
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Nothing turned up in Google Books, so good there.

Do you happen to know what work was started before the keel laying? I'd assume work on the engines or turret or something.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Nothing much to pick at here. Great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 15:04, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My source doesn't specify, but I suspect that it was some of the internal framing and similar stuff based on how the Brits built Dreadnought so quickly. Some of my references show the building slip before the formal keel-laying and it was strewn with partially assembled frames that just need to be craned into place and then riveted together. Typically, if built by the shipyard, the engines, boilers and other machinery, were built on a totally separate schedule from the hull so I really have no idea how their construction times related to that for the hull other than the obvious. It also depended on if the shipyard typically installed them before or after launching.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, can't ask for something that's not in the source. Parsecboy (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]