Talk:Russian ironclad Petropavlovsk/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 22:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Review will commence in a few days. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Lead & Infobox
[edit]Unless it is mentioned within your reference texts, how are you sure the vessel was named for the siege of Petropavlosk and not Petropavlosk? I assume it is mentioned in the given source?
- See the first sentence of the Construction and service section.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:12, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but I was/am asking if you can confirm within your sources that the moniker is topical to the siege, as opposed to the city. As I said, I assume you can? QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, it's named for the siege.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but I was/am asking if you can confirm within your sources that the moniker is topical to the siege, as opposed to the city. As I said, I assume you can? QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Description
[edit]Fine here.
Construction and service
[edit]I know in most of your previous articles, you mention the location of the ship's scrapping. Is it not possible to in this article? QatarStarsLeague (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know for sure, but it was probably Saint Petersburg. But that's just my guess.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- If you cannot source this information, that is fine. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)