Talk:Russian battleship Knyaz Suvorov/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buggie111 (talk · contribs) 15:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	I understand Russian refs are in Further reading, but should they be used.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Benea mentions a lot of interesting stuff at Dogger Bank, and I don't see that here. Consider The Tsar's Last Armada
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Assuming File:Knyaz'Suvorov1904Kronshtadt.jpg was at Kronstadt, it needs a Russian PD tag.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Oh, Sturm. C'mon. Any more and you'll nominate Sevastopol for FAR. Any more jumping on my work will result in me SUING YOU IN A COURT OF LAW IN TRENTON, NEW JERSEY!!!!! (hope you get the joke). Still, great article. Look over Talk:Russian battleship Knyaz Suvorov/GA1 to see Benea's concerns about a previous version. Buggie111 (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't read Taras, which is lacking in bibliographic info anyways, and Watt doesn't have anything to offer that the others don't.

The photo in the infobox wasn't published in Russia, AFAIK, but in the UK, and so doesn't need Russian license.

Yeah, I'll have to dig Pleshakov out and add the Dogger Bank material. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dogger Bank info added.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]