This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Noam Chomsky accused Baker of "genocide denial with a vengeance" after the latter praised the work of Edmund Morgan, who wrote: "In the limitless and unspoiled world stretching from tropical jungle to the frozen north, there may have been scarcely more than a million inhabitants." Chomsky notes that Morgan's figure of one million is "off by many tens of millions", meaning he and Baker are denying the genocide of many millions of indigenous Americans.[7]
Chomsky's point may well be a valid one, but I question whether objecting to a statement made by a reviewer (Baker) in a review of a book written by a third party constitutes an overall evaluation of the reviewer's career or work, especially since Baker isn't a professional historian. Does this really belong here? 850 C (talk) 20:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. It is an example of the fallacy of association. Unless there is an objection raised in a timely way, I plan to remove this paragraph. --Cantabwarrior 23:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cantabwarrior (talk • contribs)
I have now removed the Chomsky quote. --Cantabwarrior 13:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cantabwarrior (talk • contribs)