Jump to content

Talk:Rush to Judgment

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rush to Judgment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe sourcing

[edit]

Similar to what was done in Mark Lane and noted in Talk:Mark Lane, I am removing the following passage from the article cited to R. Andrew Kiel:

Rush to Judgment criticizes in detail the work and conclusions of the Warren Commission. It is based on witness and expert interviews as well as evidence from the 26 volumes of the Warren Commission report itself. Sixteen publishers canceled contracts with Lane before Rush to Judgment was published.[1]"

Kiel cites that information in his book to "COPA, Dallas, 1998." The Coalition on Political Assassinations apparently did meet in Dallas in 1998 [1], but since when is COPA a reliable source of anything? Despite his background as a history teacher [2], Kiel is clearly a JFK conspiracy theorist [3] and we don't use information from conspiracy books to build articles about other conspiracy books. -Location (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]