Talk:Ruppert Archaeopteryx
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruppert Archaeopteryx article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contributor
[edit]I own one of these machines (serial 003) - see http://swissluijten.com/id14.html RonaldGlider (talk) 16:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Welcome aboard, it is always useful to have someone with first hand knowledge of the subject matter. - Ahunt (talk) 08:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Broken ref links
[edit]I noticed that many references on this page are broken links (Ruppert Composite has revamped their website in Feb 2012) RonaldGlider (talk) 20:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Let me run the checklink tool and see what comes up. - Ahunt (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- It identified seven dead links, let me try to fix them now! - Ahunt (talk) 23:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Done - Ahunt (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- I found all the references that had been tagged as missing and reorganized the development timeline into one paragraph. See what you think of that approach. - Ahunt (talk) 11:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Flytec 6030
[edit]Great! I added a link to the avionics -- is this the way to do it? I have not found out how to do this with the double square brackets... RonaldGlider (talk) 06:55, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- I had to remove it. As per WP:EL external links are not used in article text. I could have converted it to a reference but the web page doesn't mention that the unit is used in the Archaeopteryx, so it isn't a useful ref. I did add this ref though, which does prove the unit is used on the aircraft. - Ahunt (talk) 08:36, 25 August 2012 (UTC)