Talk:Run of a sequence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

@Jochen Burghardt: reverted an edit I made, stating > this made it inconsistent with the lead; if both <-runs and ≤-runs can be sourced, this should be done ("strict run" vs. "weak run" or similar?))

I am following it in the talk page, as it will be far easier to discuss.

I have no doubt some author add to use «weak run» instead of «struct run», and that both makes sens. Actually, I started working on this because I was studying the notion of pre sorterdness, and the weak run seems far more interesting that the strict one as far as sorting is concerned. However, I have yet to find a publish article I can quote which formalize this difference, which introduce those names and which defines "weak run". So I can't actually use it in the wikipedia article, even if I would love to as soon as I find this article

--Arthur MILCHIOR (talk) 05:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My only concern is consistency of the article with itself, and with its references. It should use "<" everywhere and provide appropriate references (or a {{citation needed}} tag as a reminder to search for them), or it should use "≤" everywhere and provide references for that. If both version exists in the literature, it should mention both. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]