Talk:Rumour Has It (Adele song)

Adele Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Adele, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Adele on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AdeleWikipedia:WikiProject AdeleTemplate:WikiProject AdeleAdele articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Source that this was released as a single?

I searched everywhere, and i can't find any source or proof that this was released as a single......and that cover art is fake.....Cockinesss (talk) 22:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have done nothing wrong, and have been warned without just cause. This is not a single, there is no proof of it. Calvin • ^TalkThatTalk 22:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you have done wrong by edit warring. 5 reverts in a 24 hour period is unacceptable, regardless of how warranted you think it is. Toa Nidhiki05 23:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from the edit warring, which the user has been made aware of (he is new, we all make mistakes), he right about this song not being a single at the moment. Calvin • ^TalkThatTalk 00:10, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the 4th single?

I'm just wondering why this doesn't have a single page as it was released as the 4th single in the UK. I'm not sure if it was ever officially confirmed by her label and I don't think a proper "single" package happened but it was added to radio (and was playlisted by BBC Radio 1 for many weeks) in the UK and I do think it was released in other countries too. It is hard to find confirmation of it being a single but it definitely was. Radio 1 doesn't playlist random songs. So yeah I am just suggesting it gets its own page as a single and not just in the "other songs" section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.83.213.135 (talk) 22:00, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

4th U.S. Single In March

She said in March that she would make it a single. It wasn't released on November 5th (In the UK it might have), but i mean, shouldn't we change it? Kalestorm (talk) 03:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cover complaint

Whoever is removing the cover to the article, please cut it out!!!!!! The cover was added to the article by me and I wish that people would stop removing it!!! If you have a problem with the cover in the article infobox, please talk to me about this and give me a good reason why the cover is being removed!!!! ~ RomeAntic 14 02:08, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Click the "Article" tab above then click the "View history" tab. At the top of the history is a notation that says "The file title itself says "FanMade" - this is not an official cover" - that is the good reason. This is the second time the cover was removed - both times the explanation was the same. Official covers only for articles. Fanart is not official. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutepunk

Should we be using Absolutepunk as a source? The review sourced in the article seems to be from a user on the site. According to his profile, he appears to be in college still. What makes him a notable source for genre and music? I'm leaning towards the removal of this source. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's been three days and no one has objected any removal of this, so I'll be removing it now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Tone

The tone of this article is a bit confusing. There seems to be an overrepresentation of positive article reviews that weed out some of the more important takeaway statements. They're a bit disorganized as well, so it's hard to pick out unique criticisms.

There also seems to be a lack of sources in the lead section.

I'm still a little confused on the resolution of the cover of the article; Is it accurate?--JakePG7 (talk) 02:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC) JakePG7 (talk) 02:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]