Talk:Ruislip Gardens tube station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

London Stub‑class Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ruislip Gardens tube station/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Assessed as start class. To achieve B class:-

It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. = no
It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. = yes
It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. = yes
It is free from major grammatical errors. = yes
It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams = yes

Comments:- History and The station today sections need verifiable references for the statements made with them. Mjroots (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 13:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)