Talk:Ruined orgasm
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 6 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Erotic sexual denial. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
"Some information in this article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable."
pfffft
This is part of a highly private subculture. theres not likely to be written sources. The only sources are to read sexually oriented forums like
http://www.lockmeup.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincspoacher (talk • contribs)
- The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Mdwh 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Merged
[edit]Merged into Erotic sexual denial -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. FT2 (Talk | email) 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have not previously been monitoring this article, so I didn't know about the merge. Had I known, I would have objected, because ruined orgasm is not the same as erotic sexual denial. I've now restored the article and shall try to improve it. Of course, if anyone still wishes to make it a re-direct, I shall be happy to debate it.--Taxwoman 21:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)