This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Porto, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PortoWikipedia:WikiProject PortoTemplate:WikiProject PortoPorto articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot04:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
@CatiaEditsWiki: You keep editing this page in an unclear way, which includes removing information that is sourced but which you claim to be "false and biased". Can you please explain specifically the reasons for each your proposed changes, so that we can reach a consensus about them before proceeding? LongLivePortugal (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If what you say about his resignation is true, then it doesn't justify that we merely delete the information about his resignation, but rather that we replace it with the correct information. I will do that and add the source you mentioned.
As for the November 2021 elections, I accept that explanation.
Can you please explain the remaining changes you are performing?
Also, please stop reverting my edits while this discussion is taking place. Decisions on Wikipedia are based on consensus. When there is a dispute about an edit you have performed which ends up being reverted, the matter should be discussed in order to reach consensus before the controversial edit is reinstated. Failure to do so could be considered edit warring, which is prohibited on Wikipedia. LongLivePortugal (talk) 08:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am adding information about his education, professional career and also PSD leadership. All true information according to his bio and the party's official website, which has true facts. I have been putting the sources so I don't see why you keep deleting this information. CatiaEditsWiki (talk) 08:16, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@CatiaEditsWiki: Your latest edit shows you are attempting to add unsourced information and removing sourced text.
You are adding the following four unsourced sentences:
"Repeating the position [of vice-president of the PSD], between 2008 and 2010, with Manuela Ferreira Leite."
"Rio was reelected Mayor of Porto, with absolute majority in 2005, against Francisco Assis, and in 2009, against Elisa Ferreira."
"His third and final term ended on the 22 October of 2013, having been, to date, the mayor who, in the history, has longest presided its destinies."
"During eight years (2005-2013), Rio also presided over the Porto Metropolitan Board, which, to date, is also the maximum period of time in which the position can be held."
Perhaps you have placed a source in an earlier edit and have forgotten it in the latest one. Either way, please add the sources to these four statements.
And you are removing the following three sourced pieces of information:
"In January 2020, Rio fended off another leadership challenge on a promise to keep the leading opposition force on a centrist course. In the party's 2020 leadership election, he scored 53 percent in a runoff vote against the party's former parliamentary spokesman Luís Montenegro, who demanded a more aggressive opposition to António Costa's Socialist Party following the Social Democrats' worst result in over 30 years in the parliamentary elections the previous October."
"Rio's statements were a response to Paulo Mota Pinto, who referred to Rio for further clarification on the alleged 'dark interests' who want to dominate the party. [...] Rio admitted to perceiving Paulo Mota Pinto's reference."
I will revise and include all sources to the information you mention.
As for the information excluded, the one refering to Freemasonry, the information makes no sense as is. Somenone wrote that Paulo Mota Pinto referred to Rio for further clarification but the information about Mota Pinto's original statement is nowhere. Also, this information doesn't seem important to the bio overall, we have big themes as education, career, awards, PSD leadership and then, without context or relevance, and entire section about this. Why do you think this enlightens people or makes sense overall to be featured? CatiaEditsWiki (talk) 10:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@CatiaEditsWiki: The information about Paulo Mota Pinto provides context for Rio's statements, which is why it makes sense. It is in the sources. They say that Mota Pinto's original claims had been made in an interview to Expresso; if you find them, feel free to add them for further context. As for the whole section about the Freemasonry, it is here because it was one of the main points that marked Rio's distinction from Montenegro and Pinto Luz in the internal election. LongLivePortugal (talk) 11:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
