Jump to content

Talk:Rude Boy (Rihanna song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review the article and list issues if existent. TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • References: The date format should be the same everywhere., but this won't majorly affect the review.
GA review (see here) for what the criteria is.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The article is greatly written, just fix the date format in the references, and I'm gladly passing it for GA status. Congrats to all editors and the nominator, Calvin NaNaNaC'mon!, who helped make this happen! TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't think the article was this good to not have anything to amend, I would have thought there would be some points? Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 11:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if you would like to improve more, the personnel section could be a bit better referenced, but I didn't consider important enough to prevent GA status. TRLIJC19 (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So that is the only other thing in the entire article you think should be amended? Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 18:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. If you feel my judgements are inadequate, then request a reassessment, but I stand by my review. TRLIJC19 (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]