Talk:Rude Boy (Rihanna song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

I'll review the article and list issues if existent. TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

• References: The date format should be the same everywhere., but this won't majorly affect the review.

GA review (see here) for what the criteria is.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The article is greatly written, just fix the date format in the references, and I'm gladly passing it for GA status. Congrats to all editors and the nominator, Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!, who helped make this happen! TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I didn't think the article was this good to not have anything to amend, I would have thought there would be some points? Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 11:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Well, if you would like to improve more, the personnel section could be a bit better referenced, but I didn't consider important enough to prevent GA status. TRLIJC19 (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

So that is the only other thing in the entire article you think should be amended? Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 18:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes. If you feel my judgements are inadequate, then request a reassessment, but I stand by my review. TRLIJC19 (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)