Talk:Ruby Lin/GA1

GA Review

Short review

"Endorsements" part should be re-organize by year, or sort of product.
"Stardom, 2003-present" is not a very neutral heading title
"Personal quotes" part should have more information with citations

Personally, I don't think "Personal quotes" should even be there unless you can fuse it within the prose (as is the case with the other block quotes). POV still remains a problem with the two major acting sections. Pandacomics (talk) 10:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree w/ Pandacomics about personal quote part. Deleted some words (top, popular, best, influential ..etc) or phrases to watch for POV. Still need more edit. And I don't think both "Endorsements" and "stardom" title has problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Getdownbe (talk 10:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Stardom" is already a POV title. Pandacomics (talk) 18:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review 2

I'm taking over this review. Here's what I found during my initial look through the article:

The lead should be about 3 or 4 paragraphs summarizing all the main points of the article.
Header tips: 1) only the first letter of the first word and proper nouns should be capitalized - Edited some
See WP:DASH for correct dash usage. I see some definite problems here.
Citations should be after punctuation without a space between the citation number and the punctuation character. Try to do this as best as possible, although there are times when it is impossible.
"4th" and "2nd" - spelling these out is much more professional - Done
"Ruby Lin in the media" - it is best to avoid putting the subject of the article in the headers. Simply "Media" would be much better. - Done
The quote in "Harassing calls" needs a source. - Done
Personal quotes should be removed or integrated into the text (with sources!). Actually, it would be best to move them to WikiQuote. - Done
Image:Clipcapturedpic.jpg needs a fair use rationale. - Done
Please see WP:EL about appropriate external links to list. For example, fansites are not allowed unless they are official. - Done
A general copyedit would do a world of good. I saw missing punctuation, capitalization mistakes, spacing mistakes, etc.

The article will remain on hold for one week to allow for improvements. Thanks. Nikki311 22:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The seven days are up, and there hasn't been enough improvement to pass the article. I'd recommend a good copyedit, as that would fix the majority of the issues that are left. A peer review may also be helpful. Good luck! Nikki311 17:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]