A fact from Ruben M. Benjamin House appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Thought about it, just didn't seem like there was enough info to do that, why break things up now, when the article on the house gets longer, yeah, for sure. Why does that seem "curious"? It seemed like adherence to WP:SUMMARY to me. IvoShandor10:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I feel people are too quick to give an article to anything. I find so many crappy articles, just because they feel there needs to be one. I say, once the article gets longer, I would maybe then split it, have a small section to Ruben, with a main article link to his own. This can be done down the road.--Kranar drogin11:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I mean if you have something, go ahead and split it off. I don't have a problem with it, we can reorganize this and then summarize Mr. Benjamin here with a link pointing to {{main article}}. The only reason I didn't do it is because I didn't really think I had enough information to do more than create two stubs, seemed dumb to separate such closely related material until we had more, which it seems we do. I had no idea he was portrayed in fiction, in what? IvoShandor05:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]