Talk:Royce de Rohan Barondes

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Visited this page after being sent here by "Random Article" and decided to do minor cleanup by adding citations. Added citations to the introduction from School of Law, University of Missouri. Article could use a bit more cleanup. Mmcdougall (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to use this page to practice editing; in this case using a bio template Mmcdougall (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Teaching and Criticism" section: war of non-neutral weasel words re: a living person

I'm removing the "Teaching and Criticism" section because it violates just about every Wikipedia requirement from the avoidance of weasel words to the use of NPOV language (though the side taken differs from sentence to sentence as different partisans edit the paragraph) to the heightened verifiability requirements for BLP material. -- 165.176.7.3 (talk) 21:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]