Talk:Royal succession bills and acts

Good start to the article

This is a good start to the article. I have done some work to clean this up to bring it in line with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. In particular,

coloured text is not used in Wikipedia because it causes problems for visually impaired readers -- Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Text_formatting#Color;
repeated links and links to ordinary English words are to be avoided -- see WP:REPEATLINK;
links should be made to substantive articles instead of to disambiguation pages -- see WP:LINK;
deadlinks should generally be avoided;
the Wikipedia style of capitalisation of section headings should be followed -- see WP:HEAD; and
boldfacing should only be used in circumstances outlined in WP:BOLDFACE.

Ground Zero | t 22:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Title does not reflect global perspective

This article should be titled something like "British Royal Succession Bills and Acts" or "Royal Succession Bills and Acts of the United Kingdom". It's not even about the Commonwealth realms, let alone the world's other monarchies. --69.158.92.137 (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Propose: "Royal Succession Bills and Acts (United Kingdom)". Qexigator (talk) 09:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]