Talk:Royal Society of Edinburgh

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Scotland High‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edinburgh Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh"

Most of the pages that link here are articles on Fellows, and a good many of those link through FRSE (piped or directly), so I think it facilitating to put "Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh" in bold near the top. This allows those unfamiliar with "FRSE" as a title, running across it in an article, to click the link and quickly grasp its meaning. ENeville 21:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notable fellows

We need some sort of criteria for the list of notable fellows. I think having a wikipedia article isn't enough to be "notable".

I don't think being a university Vice-Chancellor is enough by itself, either, especially compared with the Nobel laureates etc on the list. I've removed Brian Lang and Muir Russell, neither of whom have noteworthy intellectual achievements to their names (Russell was a civil servant and Lang was a failed social anthropologist). —Preceding unsigned comment added by KarenSutherland (talk • contribs) 20:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to nowhere

I think it's poor that titles like "New Philosophical Journal" redirect here and are not received with any information. Redirects should be meaningful. In any event, that journal (early 19th C.) was significant in its day, and its founder and editor Robert Jameson was significant in promoting geology. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Fellows

In his contribution of 13:28 23 July 2017, TiMike asserted in the first introductory paragraph that "As of 2017, it has more than 1,660 fellows", but sadly gives a link to the list of fellows for the Royal Society (of London), not the Royal Society of Edinburgh. We could revert to the previous figures, which used a newspaper article as a reference. However, those figures might not be any more accurate, while certainly being more out-of-date. The best answer, I think, is to ask the Royal Society of Edinburgh to correct this themselves, which I will do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neil J Ross (talk • contribs) 20:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]