Talk:Royal Rumble (2006)

The Undertaker vs Kurt Angle main event of No Way Out has been advertised nationally in Canada on Bell ExpressVu (perhaps others) since Jan. 23 (maybe longer). Doesn't this make it 'official'?

And I had matches advertised at a house show that didn't come true. Until there's official confirmation by the WWE, either on Smackdown or WWE.com...it's unverified.--Toffile 04:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

I think it's official as of the end of tonight's show, since Undertaker made the hand sign for the strap around his waist and attacked the ring Angle was standing in with lightning. BronzeWarrior 08:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Gregory Helms

Unless Helms held the WWE Cruiserweight Title when he was still The Hurricane, the entry on the page right now is factually incorrect. Helms did hold a cruiserweight title in WWE when he first arrived, but that was the WCW belt, as part of the invasion. I'm not aware of the lineage of the two titles ever being merged, which as a result makes them seperate. He's a one-time WWE champion and a former WCW champion. BronzeWarrior 08:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Check this page out. It lists Helms to have held the belt a total of three times. The first, as you mentioned, was as Shane Helms on 01/03/18 as the final pure-WCW champion. A year later, on 02/05/14, he held the title his second time as Hurricane Helms. Eric42 23:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Confirmed. I fully admit to being wrong. Of course so was the Royal Rumble page, so we were each wrong, just in different ways. :) BronzeWarrior 06:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Random Special Notation?

Why does the fact that "Big Show and Kane were eliminated simultaneously by Triple H." deserve a footnote or *? Yes, it was really cool ..they were in the midst of trying to elminate each other when Triple H took advantage of the situation and shoved them both over the top rope ...but ...I still don't think it warrants its own note. Please comment, or I will remove it. --Naha|^(talk) 20:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment - Ok I see this has also been done in other Royal Rumble articles, but I still contend its not worthy of a footnote, and would like to see it removed from other articles as well. --Naha|^(talk) 20:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Nevermind, I see. --Naha|^(talk) 15:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Still true?

"This year's Royal Rumble Match featured only 14 RAW Superstars and 14 SmackDown Superstars, since both Tatanka and Goldust were surprise entrants and came in representing neither brand."

I was wondering about the comment I quoted above. Goldust appeared on RAW this past Monday night, so I do think he represented RAW in the Rumble, just as a suprise. I don't know if Tatanka was on Smackdown! or not, but if he was (is?), does this statement still stand? Eric42 03:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Goldust was also on RAW a few months back in a one-off appearance, but he was on it. Still, I don't think he really counted as a RAW member until they put him on the RAW roster page - when he was on RAW after the Rumble he wasn't even under contract yet. He is now, so perhaps we should just add a note to it stating he has since signed with RAW. Tigermave 03:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Tigermave

undertaker return

Shouldn't undertakers return be added somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterman4 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

It is. Read the last paragraph of the event section. –LAX 00:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Mark Henry Picture

The picture of Mark Henry is covering some of the table and you can't see the time of the cruiserweight match! I don't know how to fix it so if any anyone knows how to do it can they move it up or something? ThanksAdster95 (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Colour Scheme

Why are the colours for Raw and SmackDown so light? Mobile mundo (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)