Talk:Royal Nova Scotia Volunteer Regiment

Canada: Nova Scotia / Military Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian military and military history task force

Military history: British / European / North America / Early Modern / American Revolution

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

Re. Infobox

The image of the coatee that supposedly belonged to a private of the RNSVR should be removed. This was in fact a coatee of a private of the Royal Nova Scotia Regiment. Note the standing collar and other features that were not part of the clothing regulations of 1768. Wreck Smurfy (talk) 02:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the image from the infobox and added to to the RNSR article. If an image is incorrect, you don't need to establish a consensus to remove and can remove it yourself. Kges1901 (talk) 10:42, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]