Talk:Royal Military Police Close Protection Unit

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[Untitled]

Why should this article be deleted? It is about a government military unit that is known and has not yet been written about. There are many other units that have been witten about that are in exactly the same position as this one. I have talked to quite a few people who would like to see this article on Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swiny164 (talk • contribs)

The problem is that it is impossible to determine from the article why this unit is important enough to warrant an article. The U.S. Secret Service protects the President and Vice-President of the United States. But this unit seems to protect foreign dignitaries. Is it important enough to warrant an article? I can't tell. Presumably every military unit has a useful function. Why is this unit worthy of an article?

--Richard (talk) 08:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its not that it is not worthy more that anyone with any real knowledge of what it does will not say due to operational security, myself included. I am surprised to see it here tbh. --Pandaplodder (talk) 10:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Not notable enough to stand alone from Royal Military Police. Will merge in a couple of days. ninety:one 21:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]