Talk:Royal Marines Reserve

Military history: Maritime / National / British / European / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	National militaries task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

What's Wrong?

What's wrong with this article for a starter? Sure, it's an official "public affairs" handout, but it's good basic information. Yeah, it needs references and maybe some more historical connections, etc., but it's a start. --TGC55 14:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made a bit of a start!

OK - I've done some minor work on this article but there is little doubt that section 3 and possibly 4 & 5 needs some work. When I get a chance I will try but it would be useful if someone was around who had actual experience of RMR in case I (who know nothing about it!) make any silly mistakes? If you can help get back to me here or on my talkpage, I'll catch either. -- Nigel ^(Talk) 10:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Official History of the Royal Marines Reserve

There appears to be nothing on a web or book search titled Official History of the Royal Marines Reserve, can the anon ip editor supply more details, ISBN or OCLC numbers or a web address.Jim Sweeney (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Change

As you can see i have significantly changed the page. I have removed as much biased content as i can, added new sources and restructured the article (as lot of parts were repeated or broken). I have fixed links and tried to find some more pictures, although copyright as always poses an issue. Please feel free to edit and contribute, especially in finding sources for the 'history' section. I shall nominate this page for a c/b class verification in the future, as mentioned earlier on this page, it deserves a higher classification. Thanks --Tacita620 (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]