Talk:Royal Hudson

	Trains Portal
DYK	2007-05-02

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Picture

This site has an excellent one: http://cincinnatirrclub.org/RoyalHudson.htm

I'd recomend somebody had a word to see if it could be used. Ranting Martian

tag

Great article, I must say. I stumbled across it in "random article", I may be wrong, and you may have referenced it further down, but you could do with a citation where I've put the ^{[citation needed]} tag. (Yes I realise how irritating it is to have these tags whacked onto articles, hence my justification here! Sorry!)

numbering

The sentence "(numbered 2820-2859, 2860-2860 were built one year later as Royal Hudsons)" doesn't make much sense to me. Should the last number be different? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.119.225.44 (talk) 06:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2860 return to steam

The story about the rear truck seems suspect to me, While 2860 was in service with BC Rail it used a boiler pressure gauge and a steamchest pressure gauge borrowed from 2850. I'm not aware of the rear truck being traded and find it a bit unlikely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by E&N 6004 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2860 Status

To the anonymous person who keeps editing the preservation status section, please cite your sources and reason for the change you are making to 2860s status. In 2010 she was put away in fully operational condition. Besides boiler inspections, there has been no official word that suggests a need to change that status.

Thanks.

HistoryMaker2001 (talk) 05:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]