This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Does anyone want to justify having the list of Presidents laid out in reverse chronological order? This article is supposed to be an objective overview of the Society's past and present, not a recruiting vehicle, and I would have thought this aim would be best achieved by adopting a historical – i.e. chronological – approach, as is done for most comparable lists elsewhere. Unless anyone can come up with some compelling counter-arguments here, I will reverse the list in a few days time. GrindtXX (talk) 21:34, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
