Talk:Royal Hawaiian Hotel
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Ownership
[edit]Just to clarify, the article states that Starwood owns the hotel in the info box, but in the body it says it's owned by the Osano family. Anyone have further info on this? --Travis Thurston+ 07:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know, but I don't see why the Osano brothers should have their own section. I'm going to combine this with the History section where I think it belongs.
- In 2007 it was owned by Kyo-ya Hotels & Resorts LP, according to this: Royal Hawaiian Hotel to close for renovations. I suspect it's owned by Osana family by way of Kyo-ya, and Starwood is the franchiser. But I can't find a recent source.
- There is a bit more info here: Sheraton Waikiki Hotel Rees11 (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
History
[edit]The frst paragraph in the history section has numerous inaccuracies including the relationship between the purchase of the Moana Hotel by the Matson Navigation Co. and the subsequent building of the Royal Hawaiian. The Matson Navigation Co. did not even acquire the Moana Hotel until 1932 which was 5 years after the Royal Hawaiian opened. There is also a suggestion that William Matson was directly responsible for the Royal Hawaiian which is gross exageration of his role since he died in 1917. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanapapiki (talk • contribs) 21:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Is this an ad or an article?
[edit]Probably useless to try to rewrite this thing and battle the hotel's PR staff. So bad that the cost of building the hotel is cited twice, and changes. Came here because of Mad Men. When they wanted to set a scene in the sixties, they set it here. Not a good sign. This area was less fashionable by the Eighties, and heavily aimed at Japanese tourists. Profhum (talk) 20:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Royal Hawaiian Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141205060621/http://www.hawaiihotel.org/top-resorts-in-hawaii.html to http://www.hawaiihotel.org/top-resorts-in-hawaii.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://kyoyahotelsandresorts.com/timeline.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Abigail Kawananakoa
[edit]The article states that Abigail Kawananakoa, "would have been Queen of the Kingdom of Hawaii had the monarchy survived." That's not strictly true. While Abigail Kawananakoa certainly would have been a candidate for the throne, the fact that Liliʻuokalani died without issue, and that she did not (or rather, could not, as it was no longer possible to fulfill the constitutional requirements) select a new heir designate after her original heir designate, Victoria Kaʻiulani, died in 1899, means that, under Article 22 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawaiʻi, no one had a legitimate pretense to the Hawaiian throne, and it would have been necessary that the Legislature of the Kingdom of Hawaii elect a new Sovereign from among the aliʻi had the Kingdom survived (or were the Kingdom restored) after 1917. Consequently, I'm removing that statement.—MNTRT2009 (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)