Talk:Royal Blue (B&O train)/GA

GA On Hold

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Please add a fair use rationale for Image:OP-2599.jpg and I think the article will be good to go. I will come back in about three days and see if this is complete. Argos'Dad 15:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed I've replaced Image:OP-2599.jpg with another image more relevant to this article and provided detailed Fair Use Rationale at Image:B&O Royal Blue locomotive -51.jpg JGHowes ^talk - 07:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: yes

2. Factually accurate?: yes

3. Broad in coverage?: yes

4. Neutral point of view?: yes

5. Article stability? {{{stable}}}

6. Images?: free or fair use with tags

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Argos'Dad 15:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]