Talk:Royal Adelaide Hospital

Australia: Adelaide / South Australia / Education Low‑importance

	Australia portal Royal Adelaide Hospital is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Hospitals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Picture

Someone deleted a picture of the new RAH! Why?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.103.25.137 (talk) 12:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History

I suggest this article be split into two and some decent photographs be incorporated into the "Old RAH" article. Doug butler (talk) 22:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cost blow out

Would be good to quote @PremierMiekRann who stated "Yes its true!Let me repeat. Any clai that we are spending $2.7billion on construction costs for new RAH is bullshit!" 2001:8003:6A23:2C00:483F:6824:35DC:F7D7 (talk) 12:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a very unhelpful contribution to the article. Best to just leave it alone. Jkokavec (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Split discussion

This article is about the hospital as an institution, (ideally) containing historical info about how it was on the old site and updated info about the new hospital (building and operation). Lot Fourteen seems to be the name adopted for the site of the old hospital, and this is a separate entity (which may or may not acquire a new name in the future), about the new cultural precinct and other buildings planned on the site. Unless anyone objects in the next few weeks, I'll create a new article when I have time. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, this post is from 2019. Dont worry, not a lot has changed. Things move slowly.129.127.32.138 (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]