Talk:Roy Crisp

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This redirect is supported by the sports and games work group.

Australia: Australian rules football

	Australia portal Roy Crisp is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Redirect

Have redirected on the basis of failing WP:GNG. Player was previously deemed notable under the WP:NAFL for having played one Victorian Football League game, but this SNG no longer exists after WP:NSPORTS2022. Redirected to the player list article rather than deleted based on previous AfDs for similar situations, e.g. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Graham_Kemp.

All references in the article are database or Holmesby & Main. Google search for "Roy Crisp" Collingwood shows up database and wikis only [1]. 1909-1911 newspaper search for Crisp Collingwood Football shows nothing beyond WP:ROUTINE [2]. Conclusion is that multiple secondary independent sources do not exist and shall never exist. I have made this change unilaterally as I believe it uncontroversial, but the above would be the basis for an AfD nomination if required. Aspirex (talk) 04:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You really are a complete loser thinking that deleting these articles is a valid and worthwhile cause. Lets just destroy all the work that's been done because of a policy change. Your mum must be so embarrassed about you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:9160:8501:8093:CAE4:DDC5:D766 (talk) 09:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]