Talk:Roxane Mesquida

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Roxane Mesquida.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Roxane Mesquida.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 18 August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Birth year vandalism

Just curious: why do some people derive pleasure from switching her birth year to 1981? According to IMDB it's 1986. Which would correctly make her 14 when Fat Girl was filmed in 2000. Fnordware (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, spoke too soon. More recent US articles do indicate she was born in 1981. Good to know that she was at least 18 when she did nude scenes in Fat Girl. IMDB is wrong. Fnordware (talk) 04:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's examine the birth year evidence, shall we?

1986:

Passport scan. Looks pretty good to me, but what do I know?
Unofficial fan site says 1986.

1981:

Her IMDB entry used to say 1986, but now says 1981. Not sure who makes changes there.
Undated interview regarding The Last Mistress (2007) says she is 26, which would indicate 1981 birth year. This blog says the interview took place 24 October 2007. Here's another one.
2011 Hollywood Reporter interview says she's 29 at the time.
Fat Girl (2001) featured Roxane fully nude. If born in 1981, she would have been 18-19 during filming. If born in 1986, only 13-14, which is illegal even in France, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fnordware (talk • contribs) 21:12, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That link to her "Passport scan" should be deleted as it's revealing Roxane Mesquida's private information on a public website - not to mention publishing an unauthorized government document - which would be illegal in most countries. Maybe it can be emailed to be reviewed and discussed with management for possible future changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.73.121.201 (talk) 22:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Got a Wikipedia policy link? I don't think that rule would apply to a talk page or where I got it from: a comment in the change log. Seems like the site that could face legal action would be the company hosting the image, not Wikipedia. Fnordware (talk) 23:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]