Talk:Routing loop

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force.

Something wrong

Appears to have been quietly corrected at some point. ~Kvng (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There appears to be a problem with this page; it refers to the link between "nodes B and B" being down, but that doesn't make sense. It is probably supposed to say "nodes B and C", but because I am not familiar with this topic I don't want to make the edit myself.

It also seems to reference a network diagram for a four-node network ABCD that is not included anywhere on the page.

something wrong

There should be 5 network nodes

not mentioned in the pciture —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilan2005 (talk • contribs) 05:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitly there's something wrong!!!! it makes no sense at all , in the diagram there's three unnamed nodes and the topic is about 5!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.205.254.250 (talk) 11:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

BGP not a distance vector routing protocol

The article reads "Newer distance-vector routing protocols (BGP, EIGRP, DSDV, Babel) have built-in loop prevention"... BGP uses path vector routing though... Sorry, but don't have time to come up with an appropriate edit right now, but put it out there as something people should be aware of. 118.208.123.108 (talk) 13:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture not really applicable

Router A has two routes two router C so how could a routing loop occur? This image will create great confusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmacward (talk • contribs) 17:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]