Talk:Route 491 (Pennsylvania–Delaware)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few edits that you're free to revert.[1], mostly expanding names for clarification.
What is a "Legislative Route"?

Should make clear CSX's Philadelphia Subdivision.CSX is a railroad. This is a railroad crossing?

Clarified it's a railroad line. It is a railroad crossing. Dough 48 72 00:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough 48 72 00:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:

b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

c. no original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
no edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass!