Talk:Rouleaux

Medicine: Hematology-oncology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.

common typo?

Would a {{see also|Reuleaux}} hatnote be out of place here? The Straight Dope incorrectly uses this term for the geometric shape. -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 13:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

list known causes

should list the known causes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.0.250 (talk) 16:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opportunity for optical microscope images of red blood cells

There are currently very few open-licenced optical images of red blood cells, other than slide smears which encourage misconceptions about how tightly packed RBCs are. Witness this article currently not having any. Nor Red blood cell. So I note that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9va0KPrVExs has a CC BY license, and nice images of RBCs. And rouleaux. Some frames captures could make a nice addition to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Red_blood_cells , and to this article. Fyi. 71.192.162.194 (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Typo? "Highlightsr"

What is this word in the image caption meant to mean? "Highlightsr" looks like a typo to me, but the obvious correction -- "highlights" -- seems meaningless in context. Autocorrect error? Liam Proven (talk) 10:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]