Jump to content

Talk:Rough Landing, Holly/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I'm  GARDEN  and will be reviewing this article for GA for you. I'm pretty new to the process so apologies if I screw it up a little :D

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Good, particularly the pull-quote.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Good references, no obvious doubts.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    As broad as it can be. Perhaps focusing a little too much on the video but it is a special one I suppose.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    No problems.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    Nor here.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No many images you can add really.
  7. Overall: I'm more than happy to pass this, well done!
    Pass/Fail: