Talk:Rouen porcelain
Appearance
A fact from Rouen porcelain appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that only nine pieces (one pictured) are thought to survive made by the earliest French porcelain factory, operating in Rouen c. 1673 to 1696? Source: "all here - European Porcelain in The Metropolitan Museum of Art, By Jeffrey Munger, Elizabeth Sullivan
- Reviewed: I'm reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Honora Jenkins' will, & left a query note some days ago, but the nom has a note saying they lack internet access for a while. No rush. Johnbod (talk) 12:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: This was split off from an expansion, mostly now left at Rouen faience. To check for expansion, should be compared with the porcelain section of that, from 14 April.
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 13:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC).
- @Johnbod: where is the QPQ? Yoninah (talk) 05:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Coming, like it says. There's been a lot of French pottery of late (indeed there's one on MP right now), so I'm trying to space out the last two a bit. Only 2 more to go (this and Template:Did you know nominations/Rouen faience) & I'm not planning any more for the present. Back in March I did try to get the early ones on MP quickly to spread them out that way, but it was a complete flop. Johnbod (talk) 12:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- This article is new enough and seems to me to be long enough. The image is suitably licensed, the hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ is underway. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)