Talk:Rostral migratory stream/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 05:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Issues needing to be addressed before final review

Firstly, I would like to complement the editors who have worked on this page. Well done! I am impressed by the depth of this article and how far it has progressed from its former stub status a few months ago. I've only had to make a few very small corrections (such as italicizing Latin terms like "in vivo"), so I am also impressed by how clean the article is in terms of punctuation and formatting. However, there are a few changes that need to be made before I can pass this as a good article. Here are the issues:

• In the "Age-related decline" section, there is the sentence "The decline of neurogenesis in the and migration from the hippocampus in human...". The decline in where?
• All of the images need to cite where the images were originally published in the image caption.
• In the "Toolbox" in this review page, you will see the "disambig links". If you click on that link, it will show you that there are 4 links to disambiguation pages in the article. Please redirect these links to there correct destinations.
• What is DCX? PSA-NCAM? All acronyms should be defined in the article.

That is all. I will put this article's review status as "on hold" until they can be taken care of. This should generally be done in a weeks time. Good luck and happy editing! --Tea with toast (話) 00:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking the time to look at our page, we went through in order to fix the few problems that you had mentioned and everything should now be in working order. Thanks for the help! Esimonelli (talk) 01:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Oops, I am sorry I was not more specific about the citations for the images. They should also have footnote citations that link to the references section. Thank you for taking care of all the other items! --Tea with toast (話) 17:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Should be all set now, thanks for clearing it up. Tyler8014 (talk) 20:28, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Final assessment

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Well done! --Tea with toast (話) 04:00, 21 December 2011 (UTC)