Talk:Roseville Avenue station

Roseville Avenue station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 22, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Trains: Stations / in New York City Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 13, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Roseville Avenue (NJT station)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 10:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments:

According to the MOS, all-caps is a typographical choice (like font or boldface) and is not to be used when referring to items or sources using all-caps as such (this of course does not apply for acronyms).
I converted the odd hyphen to an endash, added a few commas, split a sentence and other small stuff.
I'm uncertain if the second external link is appropriate, but I'll let it pass.

Congratulations with a good article. It is always nice to learn more about the rail history of New Jersey through your articles :) Arsenikk ^(talk) 10:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yay, thanks. :) Mitch32^{(We the people in order to form a more perfect union.)} 12:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]