Talk:Roses Are Red (disambiguation)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roses Are Red → Roses Are Red (disambiguation) – I suggest it to be self-evident that the essential meaning of this title by any capitalization is Roses are red, the traditional poem, from which all others assuredly derive the name.. DeistCosmos (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Oppose. "Roses are red" is not an ambiguous title on Wikipedia. "Roses Are Red" is an ambiguous title on Wikipedia. If the traditional poem is the primary topic for the title-cased version as well (which I suspect it is), support moving the dab to Roses Are Red (disambiguation) and redirecting Roses Are Red to Roses are red. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:29, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Cool. Thanks bro!! DeistCosmos (talk) 20:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with JHJ that the disambiguation page should be at Roses Are Red (disambiguation) and Roses Are Red should redirect to Roses are red. older ≠ wiser 12:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That being so, Mr JHunterJ and User:Bkonrad, I change my proposal accordingly, the primary point being the primary topic being the traditional rhyme. DeistCosmos (talk) 17:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.