Talk:Rosenmund–von Braun reaction
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
the references 1 and 2 are only accessible with an account for wiley interscience. far as i know only public accessible references should be used for wiki articles. --KOchstudiO (talk) 10:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hallo KOchstudiO: Das sind die orginal arbeiten von den Entdeckern, also auf en:wiki ist das Grund genug die Literaturstellen als primäre Datenquelle anzugeben, wenn es noch eine andere bessere und zugängliche Quelle gibt ist es noch besser! That this literature is only accessable in a library or from a university computer makes it not less trustfull or unappropriate for wikipedia. A book is agood source and most of them you have to buy or get in a library. This literature is the original work and the first publication done on this reaction, so it is a information on its own. Without it the origine of the name Rosenmund-von Braun synthesis would be not really clear. If there is a oppen access publication on the reaction this would be a great addition to the article.