Talk:Rosendale Theatre/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk · contribs · count) 21:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Prose is strong throughout.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
The article maintains a good style throughout.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
The article is well referenced with plenty of in-line citations.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Sources used are reliable.

C. No original research:
There does not appear to be any original research.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
The article covers the major aspects and remains focused on the subject.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
The article maintains a neutral point of view.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
The article does not appear to be subject to any edit warring.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
All images are freely licensed and available on Commons.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Captions are concise and informative.
Overall: A very interesting read. Well done. Harrison49 (talk) 16:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pass or Fail: