Talk:Rosa Antifa

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion proposed

IMHO Rosa Antifa is relevant not only on a national scale, but also from abroad - the organization and it's activities are mentioned in several books, see: [1]. Regularly, the demonstrations and press releases of Rosa Antifa are featured in Austria's most prominent media - such as ORF and Der Standard.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 11:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV and sources

This article has a bad NPOV and sources issue. I have only just neutralized a little bit. How are you ever going to source that this group (plus the Young Socialists from Lower Austria) is present "at all anti-fascist events in Austria"? Or, as it formerly read, at "each and every demonstration against fascism or capitalism in Austria"?

Also, many of the sources referenced in the article were pretty much worthless, like links to a collection of addresses, to a search page, or to other sites that do not support the quotations or the claims made. I can't tell if these sites formerly contained other material that may have supported the content of this site, but in that case, an update is really needed. --84.190.84.207 (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]