Talk:Romeo and Juliet/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Romeo and Juliet. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Repeat of earlier edit request made on 26 January 2014 (The Ghostly Father)
The book is now available and is gaining many positive reviews. http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Ghostly-Father-Sue-Barnard/dp/1909841447/ref=tmm_pap_title_0 Please reconsider your decision not to add it to the article - particularly since you have now added a mention of another novel which is not even published yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartacus2014 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
The Church's 'complicity'?
As part of the 'Criticism and interpretation', is anything (significant) extant with respect to the Church's 'direct' role in this tragedy re the Friar's scheme to defraud both families? Albeit, he has good intentions in doing so (for the sake of love), but we all know where that can lead. I don't expect there was such criticism of this/his role before about 1900, primarily due to the Catholic Church's power and influence, but i would think there must be some discussion or evaluation of the point since then, given the public disrespect for/disagreement with many of the Church's policies and practices, especially in the last several decades. What I mean is, yes, the lovers are star-crossed, but that fate is played out directly due to the Friar's scheme. Any comments? I'm sure some in the community here can find something on this.66.81.104.237 (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2014 (UTC)