Talk:Romanica

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Retarget, 2020 June 22, see discussion.
no consensus, March 15, 2007, see discussion.

Is this language for real, or just an academic curiosity for a handful of Internet users? --Eean 08:34, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

It's not a natural language, it's a constructed language. I would like an explanation of how it differs from Interlingua, when allegedly the bulk of the vocabulary is derived from it. It seems that the creators have tried to remove most of the english impact of Interlingua, thus having a language with a more complicated grammar and fewer "loanwords". Is that correct?

Their organization's website is on GeoCities which doesn't exactly scream notability to me. DopefishJustin (・∀・) 00:35, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

This debate should be reopened. There is indeed a community of users for Romanica or Interlingua Romanica since Josu Lavin founded it in 2001 as a more Romance version of of Interlingua. There are groups who use the language on Facebook and has been used on mailing-list platforms for many years. --Cavallèro^Talk!! 21:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

from VfD

On 4 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Romanica language for a record of the discussion.

Merge with Romanica language

I noticed that there are two articles around - Romanica and Romanica language with literally the same content (except for two interwiki links). I'm not going to delve into their histories, which are quite different, but I don't think a duplicate is warranted under any circumstances. I propose turning Romanica language into a redirect; that way, its history will be kept. --IJzeren Jan 18:07, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary

Apparently, Wiktionary doesn't want Romanica words, it is not a "valid language" --Dangherous 13:36, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]